유럽 ​​컵 축구 현금 베팅 SEN Engineering Group Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:50:35 +0000 en-US hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1 유럽 ​​컵 축구 현금 베팅 /2017/08/21/f-psrc-%ed%83%80%ec%84%a4-mock-up-%eb%8f%99%ec%98%81%ec%83%81/ /2017/08/21/f-psrc-%ed%83%80%ec%84%a4-mock-up-%eb%8f%99%ec%98%81%ec%83%81/#comments Mon, 21 Aug 2017 05:39:06 +0000 /?p=1498 2017년 8월 4일 (금) 센코어테크 진천공장에서 F-PSRC 기둥 타설 목업을 수행하였습니다.
이번 목업은 당사의 F-PSRC 기둥 적용이 예정된 플랜트 프로젝트를 위한 것으로서
관련 고객사인 S사 임직원들도 참관한 가운데
사이즈 2.2 x 1.7 x 19m, 영구거푸집 부착 PSRC (F-PSRC) 기둥에
밴드 없이 시간당 7.5m 타설을 무사히 마쳤습니다.

목업 상황 기록을 위해 드론을 섭외한 김에 기념삼아 우리 진천 공장 전경도 공중촬영 하였습니다.

]]> /2017/08/21/f-psrc-%ed%83%80%ec%84%a4-mock-up-%eb%8f%99%ec%98%81%ec%83%81/feed/ 0 유럽 ​​컵 축구 현금 베팅 /2016/11/18/an-integrated-evaluation-of-productivity-cost-and-co2-emission-between-prefabricated-and-conventional-columns-journal-of-cleaner-production2016-11/ /2016/11/18/an-integrated-evaluation-of-productivity-cost-and-co2-emission-between-prefabricated-and-conventional-columns-journal-of-cleaner-production2016-11/#comments Fri, 18 Nov 2016 01:07:09 +0000 /?p=1348  

2016-12-21 08;01;14

<DOWNLOAD>

– 저 자 : 정재욱, 홍태훈, 지창윤, 김지민, 이민현, 정광복, 이승환
The off-site prefabrication construction method offers several advantages that have positioned it as a good alternative to the conventional method. Recently in South Korea, a form-latticed prefabricated steel reinforced concrete (Form-LPSRC) column was invented as substitute for a conventional steel reinforced concrete (SRC) column. This study evaluates the productivity, cost, and CO2 emission of Form-LPSRC column with those of SRC column through a case study. Two factory projects utilizing same-size Form-LPSRC and SRC columns are studied. In addition, Web-CYCLONE simulation and equation-based methods are utilized to calculate the productivity, cost, and CO2 emission of the two column methods. In particular, Web-CYCLONE simulation is used for considering the idle time during the construction process. The Form-LPSRC column improved productivity by 42.5% and provided costs savings of 1.32% compared with the SRC column. Thus, the Form-LPSRC column is excellent for projects where construction duration and cost are of utmost importance. However, the CO2 emission of the Form-LPSRC column is 72.18% higher than that of the SRC column.

]]> /2016/11/18/an-integrated-evaluation-of-productivity-cost-and-co2-emission-between-prefabricated-and-conventional-columns-journal-of-cleaner-production2016-11/feed/ 0